No do-overs, even for idiots

Josh Voorhees has a Slate article about an idiot judge:

Montana Judge G. Todd Baugh can't do anything right. First, he sentenced a former teacher to thirty days in prison for having sex with a troubled fourteen-year-old student (who would later commit suicide while the case was pending). During sentencing, Baugh absurdly described the victim as "older than her chronological age" and "as much in control of the situation" as her rapist was. In the face of the local and national backlash that followed, Baugh initially defended his comments, before ultimately relenting and offering something of an apology, while still standing behind the sentence itself. Then, as the calls for his resignation continued, Baugh went ahead and scheduled a hearing to revisit that remarkably light sentence and determine whether it was actually even legal.
That brings us to this afternoon, when the Montana Supreme Court added to Baugh's ongoing professional misery by blocking the judge's attempt at a do-over. "We conclude that the stated intent of the District Court to alter the initially imposed oral sentence in today's scheduled hearing is unlawful and that the proceeding should be arrested", the high court ruled. "We take no position on the legality of the imposed sentence and will address the parties' arguments in that regard on appeal."
Highlighting just how unpopular Baugh's decisions have been lately, neither the prosecution nor the defense wanted the scheduled re-sentencing hearing to take place. The defense, as you would guess, is quite pleased with the thirty-day sentence, while the prosecution feared that revisiting the sentence now would undermine its formal appeal, which is currently winding its way through the state court system.

Rico says this is a classic judicial fuque de clusteur...