Oh, scary threat...

Jane Perlez has an article in The New York Times about Pakistan, now peeved:

The head of Pakistan’s army, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, said that he would not tolerate a repeat of the American covert operation that killed Osama bin Laden, warning that any similar action would lead to a reconsideration of the relationship with the United States.
In his first public reaction to the American raid that left many Pakistanis questioning the capacities of the nation’s army, General Kayani did not appear in person, choosing instead to convey his angry message through a statement by his press office and in a closed meeting with Pakistani reporters.
The statement by the army’s press office said: “Any similar action violating the sovereignty of Pakistan will warrant a review on the level of military/intelligence cooperation with the United States.” General Kayani had decided that the number of American troops in Pakistan was to be reduced “to the minimum essential,” the statement said. He did not specify the exact number of American troops asked to leave Pakistan, and it was not clear that the level was below what Pakistan had previously demanded after a CIA contractor shot and killed two Pakistanis in January.
Then, the Americans were told that the number of Special Operations soldiers involved in a training program would have to be reduced to 39 from 120, that CIA contractors would no longer be allowed to stay in Pakistan, and that other American officials who appeared to be working for the CIA, but whose jobs were not clearly defined, would have to leave, too.
Clearly, the Bin Laden raid has compounded Pakistani anger, and further worsened relations. Calling the American raid a “misadventure”, General Kayani told the Pakistani reporters that another, similar, raid would be responded to swiftly, a promise that seemed intended to tell the Pakistani public that the army was indeed capable of stopping the Americans’ trying to capture other senior figures from al-Qaeda.
General Kayani’s blunt warnings came after he met with his top commanders at their monthly conference at army headquarters at Rawalpindi, a gathering of the top eleven generals. The meeting was devoted to the consequences of the raid, which has severely embarrassed the Pakistani military, leaving the nation’s most prestigious institution looking poorly prepared and distrusted by its most important ally.
The official statement acknowledged “shortcomings” in developing intelligence on the presence of Bin Laden in Pakistan, a reference to the fact that the al-Qaeda leader was hiding in a compound in Abbottabad, a midsize city that is home to a top military academy and is about two hours from Islamabad, the capital.
The CIA had developed intelligence on Bin Laden with the Pakistanis in the early going when the Pakistani spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, had provided “initial information.” But the CIA did not share further development of intelligence on the case with ISI, “contrary to the existing practice between the two services,” an account that generally conformed with what American officials said in the aftermath of the Bin Laden raid.
Pakistani officials and Western diplomats have described General Kayani and Lieutenant General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, the head of ISI, as seething with anger at the American go-it-alone action. In an earlier account, the foreign secretary, Salman Bashir, sought to dispel domestic criticism of Pakistan’s lack of response to the raid, saying that two Pakistani F-16 fighter jets were airborne as soon as the Pakistani military knew about the operation. But, by that time, he said, the American helicopters were on their way back to Afghanistan.
Mr. Bashir, speaking at a news conference, said that the Americans had used technology to evade Pakistani radar. Alternately combative and defensive, Mr. Bashir said Washington should abandon the idea that Pakistan was complicit in helping Bin Laden hide. But he did not elaborate, saying only that the ISI had a “brilliant” record in counterterrorism. Defending the Pakistani Army, the fifth largest in the world, Mr. Bashir said, “Pakistani security forces are neither incompetent or negligent about the sacred duty to the nation to protect Pakistan.” But after withering criticism at home and abroad about how and why the Pakistani security forces could allow Bin Laden to be in Pakistan, the initial reaction here to Mr. Bashir’s appearance was mixed.
One of Pakistan’s best-known television journalists, Kamran Khan, regarded as a supporter of the military, dismissed the performance. “They have no answer,” Mr. Khan said. “We have become the biggest haven of terrorism in the world and we have failed to stop it.”
A retired ambassador and newspaper columnist, Zafar Hilaly, who has called for a public inquiry into Pakistan’s military, said that Mr. Bashir had erred in seeming to ask for the world’s sympathy by saying 30,000 Pakistani civilians and more than 3,000 soldiers had lost their lives in the fight against terrorism. “The world wants to know whether we are effective,” Mr. Hilaly said.
Apparently in response to comments by American officials that the United States decided not to share details in advance with Pakistan because of a lack of trust, Mr. Bashir said, “All we expect is some decency and civility, especially in the public domain.”
The Pakistani authorities first learned of the operation when one of the American helicopters involved in the raid crashed at the Bin Laden compound. “Immediately our armed forces were asked to check whether it was a Pakistani helicopter,” Mr. Bashir said. Although Abbottabad is home to a major military academy and three military regiments, he said, none of these institutions required sophisticated defenses that could have detected the impending raid. The authorities learned that Bin Laden had been killed in the raid from surviving members of his family, he said.
Pakistan received the first official word from the United States about the covert operation when the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, called General Kayani about 3 a.m. local time, Mr. Bashir said.
That call took some time to arrange, he said, because “secure sets” were needed. Mr. Bashir said Admiral Mullen had been the first to raise the issue of Pakistan’s sovereignty in the call, but he did not specify exactly what the admiral said. Later, President Obama telephoned the Pakistani president, Asif Ali Zardari.
The relationship between the United States and Pakistan will endure, the foreign secretary said, because “we share strategic convergence”.
In Washington, American aid to Pakistan faced new criticism. The top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee expressed “deep and ongoing concerns” about the United States providing Pakistan more than $1 billion a year in security assistance, in light of the discovery of Bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad and other recent evidence that Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies are aiding militants.
The lawmaker, Representative Howard L. Berman of California, wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that “Pakistan’s continued resistance to cooperate with the United States in counterterrorism bespeaks an overall regression in the relationship.”

Rico says they 'won't tolerate' a repeat of our raid. Well, we probably won't tolerate them harboring arch-criminals, either...