Worst-case scenario for Antarctica

Eric Holthaus has a Slate article with the latest on the bad news from Antarctica:

In May of 2014, a pair of science studies caught the world by surprise. Together, their evidence confirmed a key Antarctic glacier (photo) has likely passed “the point of no return” and is beginning to destabilize. The conclusion was stark: irreversible collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has begun, locking in at least ten feet of sea level rise over the next several hundred years. Mother Jones magazine called it a “holy-shit moment for global warming”.
Though it’s supremely depressing that New York City, Mumbai, and Guangzhou will most likely be underwater by the year 3000, those studies felt a bit abstract for those of us concerned about worst-case climate scenarios in our lifetime.
With the most ice on Earth, Antarctica holds the key to the world’s coastal fate. But up until now, there hasn’t been a reliable upper bounds on how much Antarctica as a whole may contribute to global sea level rise over the relatively short term of the next several decades.
A new study published in the open-source journal Earth Systems Dynamics provides that upper bounds for the first time, and it’s bigger than we thought: Antarctica alone may contribute up to fifteen inches to global sea level by 2100, more than triple previous worst-case estimates.
In a press release, Anders Levermann, of the Institute for Climate Impact Research in Potsdam, Germany and lead author of the study, said: “Earlier research indicated that Antarctica would become important in the long term. Pulling together all the evidence it seems that Antarctica could become the dominant cause of sea level rise much sooner.”
There are four major sources of sea level rise that are related to human activity: thermal expansion (as ocean water heats up, it physically expands), melting mountain glaciers worldwide, the continental ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica, and the pumping of groundwater for human use.
According to a report in September of 2013 from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s oceans are currently rising at a rate of eleven inches per century. As global warming accelerates, that pace is expected to quicken exponentially. The IPCC report, which took a snapshot of the state-of-the-art science at the time it was written, estimated a worst-case scenario of nearly forty inches of sea level rise by 2100, with only about five inches coming from Antarctica.
The new study, using models from the Sea Level Response to Ice Sheet Evolution (SeaRISE) intercomparison project, tacks on nearly a foot to that scenario. As we saw during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, during big coastal storms, a few inches goes a long way toward crossing dangerous flooding thresholds, like filling the subways with sea water.
Since there’s never been a study like this done before for the entire continent, there’s still better research needed, especially relating to how the ocean and ice interact. The authors were careful to include the full range of sub-surface melting sensitivities in an attempt to capture every plausible scenario. Since the study tried to model the entire continent’s behavior, the authors couldn’t look in detail at the inherent instability of the glaciers most likely to contribute to shorter-term sea level rise, namely the Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers in the Amundsen Sea region of West Antarctica. The Thwaites glacier is the one that made the news back in May of 2014. The three models the authors used also weren’t able to explicitly capture sudden nonlinear events, like ice calving or other ocean-ice feedbacks, that may accelerate ice loss. To account for this, the authors chose a probabilistic approach blending all three models, in part because there hasn’t been enough research done on the Antarctic to choose which model is best.
Still, the new study pushes the urgency of coastal cities planning for the worst effects of the encroaching ocean. It’s also clear about one of the biggest remaining sources of uncertainty: humans themselves. What we do over the next few decades to slow the rate of fossil fuel emissions that drive global warming will help determine how quickly the oceans warm, and therefore how quickly coastal Antarctic glaciers are melted from below. The authors find that, if the world gets in gear and sharply reduces its output of carbon dioxide, with a little bit of luck, Antarctica may not melt at all this century.
Eric Rignot, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the University of California at Irvine, and a lead author of one of the big Antarctica studies thinks that may be “wishful thinking”. In an e-mail message, Rignot, who was not directly involved with the the most recent paper, says the new study is “a step in the right direction”, in line with what recent satellite observations of Antarctica show: the frozen continent is already melting at a rate far above what previous models had predicted. “A lot of folks out there refuse to acknowledge what the satellite record shows.”
By phone, I spoke with Ben Smith of the University of Washington’s Polar Science Center and one of the authors of the other big Antarctica study. He agrees that the takeaway from the new study is clear: “You can make a big difference on what the ice sheet does, based on how fast the atmosphere warms. If you’re sitting in Bangladesh, you don’t really care why the sea level rose.” Smith added: “While the very long-term consequences are pretty set in stone, how quickly we get to them really depends on what we do now. Things happen in a more drastic way the longer you wait. A meter in ten thousand years is probably not a big problem. A meter in a hundred years is probably a big problem.”

Rico says it is a holy-shit moment, and well-said, Mother Jones...