A recent statement from PC Tools claims that Windows 2000 is a more secure operating system than Windows Vista. According to company CEO Simon Clausen, "recent research conducted with statistics from over 1.4 million computers within the ThreatFire community has shown that Windows Vista is more susceptible to malware than the eight year old Windows 2000 operating system, and only 37 percent more secure than Windows XP."
Rico says even if the analysis is wrong, why use a stupid Gates machine if you don't have to?
12 May 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment