The Ukraine for the day

The New York Times has an article by David Herszenhorn about the current situation:

The Facebook post by Prime Minister Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia was bleak and full of dread. “Blood has been spilled in Ukraine again,” wrote Medvedev, once favored in the West for playing good cop to the bad cop president, Vladimir V. Putin. “The threat of civil war looms.” He pleaded with Ukrainians to decide their own future “without usurpers, nationalists, and bandits, without tanks or armored vehicles, and without secret visits by the CIA director.”
And so began another day of bluster and hyperbole, of the misinformation, exaggerations, conspiracy theories, overheated rhetoric and, occasionally, outright lies about the political crisis in the Ukraine that have emanated from the highest echelons of the Kremlin and reverberated on state-controlled Russian television, hour after hour, day after day, week after week.
It is an extraordinary propaganda campaign that political analysts say reflects a new brazenness on the part of Russian officials. And in recent days, it has largely succeeded, at least for Russia’s domestic audience, in painting a picture of chaos and danger in the eastern Ukraine, although it was pro-Russian forces themselves who created it by seizing public buildings and setting up roadblocks.
In essence, Moscow’s state-controlled news media outlets are loudly and incessantly calling on the Ukraine and the international community to calm a situation that the Ukraine, the United States, and the European Union say the Kremlin is doing its best to destabilize.
Even the United Nations weighed in. In a report, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said that threats to ethnic Russians in the eastern Ukraine, cited repeatedly by Russian officials and in the Russian news media as a potential rationale for Russian military action, were exaggerated and that some participants in the protests in the region came from Russia.
“Although there were some attacks against the ethnic Russian community, these were neither systematic nor widespread,” said the report, which was based on two United Nations missions to the Ukraine between 15 March and 2 April 2014.
There is no question that the new Ukrainian government and its Western allies, including the United States, have engaged in their own misinformation efforts at times, with officials in Kiev making bold pronouncements in recent days of enforcement efforts that never materialized. Some American officials were spreading unverified photographs allegedly showing Russian rocket launchers carried by pro-Russian demonstrators in the eastern Ukraine.
“It’s all lies,” said Lilia Shevtsova, an expert on Russian politics at the Carnegie Moscow Center. “The Russia leadership doesn’t care about how it’s being perceived in the outside world, in the world of communication, in the world where we have plurality of information, and where information can be confirmed and checked. This is a radical change in attitude toward the West.” Shevtsova added: “We can’t trust anything. Even with the Soviet propaganda, when they were talking with the Soviet people, there were some rules. Now, there are no rules at all. You can invent anything.”
To watch the television news in Russia is to be pulled into a swirling, 24-hour vortex of alarmist proclamations of Western aggression, sinister claims of rising fascism, and breathless accounts of imminent hostilities by the “illegal” Ukrainian government in Kiev, which has proved itself in recent days to be largely powerless.
The Rossiya 24 news channel, for instance, has been broadcasting virtually nonstop with a small graphic at the bottom corner of the screen that says “Ukrainian Crisis” above the image of a masked fighter, set against the backdrop of the red-and-black flag of the nationalist, World War Two-era Ukrainian Insurgent Army, which inflicted tens of thousands of casualties on Soviet forces.
Over the course of several hours of coverage recently, Rossiya 24 reported that four to eleven peaceful, pro-Russian “supporters of federalization” in the Ukraine were killed near the town of Kramatorsk in the eastern Ukraine when a mixed force of right-wing Ukrainians and foreign mercenaries strafed an airfield with automatic gunfire from helicopter gunships before landing and seizing control.
In fact, on the ground, a small crowd of residents surrounded a Ukrainian commander who had landed at the airfield in a helicopter, and while there were reports of stones thrown and shots fired in the air, only a few minor injuries were reported with no signs of fatalities.
Adding to the public frenzy about imminent Kiev-ordered violence, Life News, a pro-Kremlin tabloid television station, offered a bounty of fifteen thousand rubles, or slightly more than four hundred dollars, for video of Ukrainian military forces mobilizing in the eastern Ukraine, suggesting that such activity was secretly underway.
An official with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which has monitors in the Ukraine, said they had not seen any direct threats to pro-Russian citizens in the eastern Ukraine, where, despite the intense news media attention, protest activity remained relatively isolated, said the official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the continuing mission.
In Slovyansk, where pro-Russian forces seized a police station and the local headquarters of the security service over the weekend, the monitors heard what seemed to be genuine fear of the authorities in Kiev, this official said, but only because they were worried that the government would try to retake the seized buildings. “Part of the reason they had the roadblocks was they were afraid the Ministry of Interior was going to launch an operation,” the official said.
Russia has flatly denied any role in the unrest in the eastern Ukraine, and the Russian Foreign Ministry, which normally champions the authority of the United Nations, dismissed the new humans rights report as biased. In a statement, Aleksandr Lukashevich, a a Foreign Ministry spokesman, called it “one-sided, politicized, and unobjective”.
Lukashevich said the report ignored “the unchecked rise of aggressive nationalism and neo-Nazism” in the Ukraine, adding that “the document abounds in flagrant selectiveness.”
Mark Galeotti, a professor of global affairs at New York University who is teaching in Moscow this semester, said that some of the lies were blatant: “You can have the sight of the Russian state honoring the ‘heroes of the Crimea’ without finding any need to reconcile that with the official line that there were no Russian soldiers there,” Galeotti said in an interview. Still, he said the propaganda was strikingly effective in the Crimea, throwing the West off-balance and buying Russian forces just enough time to solidify their control over the peninsula. “It was, on one level, transparent, embarrassingly transparent,” Galeotti said. “But I know from my conversations with various people in government, it did create that sort of paralysis, or uncertainty.” He added: “In my estimation, all they needed was a six-hour window and, by that point, they were unassailable.”
In the current situation in the eastern Ukraine, the propaganda effort also seems effective, Galeotti said, adding that some in the West were giving too much credence to the Kremlin’s statements. “If you don’t know any better, the Ukraine has descended into this anarchic ‘Mad Max’ wasteland of neo-fascist mobs hunting down ethnic Russians, so of course something has to be done.”
Putin said, in a phone call with the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, that the Ukraine was on the brink of civil war, a point Medvedev also made at a news conference later in Moscow, adding that the government in Kiev was to blame. Medvedev also repeated the Kremlin’s frequent assertion that Russian speakers were under threat in the Ukraine. t,e very claim United Nations officials rejected in their report.
“The only way to preserve the Ukraine and calm the situation,” Medvedev said, requires “recognizing that Russian citizens are the same as Ukrainians and can, therefore, use their own language in everyday life.”

Rico says it's either a further fractionating of Russia, or the start of Russia taking back all the breakaway republics... Either way, Mad Max is probably the best representation of the situation: