Spitfires that nearly broke the sound barrier

The BBC has an article by Stephen Dowling about a near-supersonic Spitfire:

On 14 October 1947, American test pilot Chuck Yeager did what many thought was impossible. Strapped into the seat of the Bell X1 rocket plane (painfully so, having broken two ribs a few days before in a horse-riding accident) Yeager became the first man to fly faster than the speed of sound.
While Yeager’s name may be the one celebrated in the record books, there were other pilots who got close, very, very close, to this challenging aerodynamic barrier in the years before. Some even lived to tell the tale. What is all the more impressive is the aircraft they flew were physically incapable of reaching the speed of sound. Just getting close could cause planes to break apart.
A handful of flights in Supermarine Spitfires, the single-seat fighter plane that helped win the Battle of Britain, were crucial in helping scientists understand the forces that would have to be overcome if a plane was able to fly faster than sound.
Yeager's record-breaking flight in the Bell X-1 was helped due to the information gathered by their high-speed dives.
The Spitfire entered service just before World War Two, the brainchild of designer RJ Mitchell. Later models of the Spitfire could fly well over four hundred mph in level flight, thanks to their powerful Rolls-Royce Merlin engine and the four-bladed propeller that helped generate extra thrust. Photo reconnaissance versions were even faster, flying without the dragging weight of machines guns or ammunition.
The plane’s superlative performance also made it a natural for test flights, especially for high-speed research. It was on these flights that some Spitfire pilots took the aircraft into previously uncharted territory,  encountering the strange aerodynamic forces that occur when the sound barrier is within reach.
According to famed test pilot Eric ‘Winkle’ Brown's book Wings on My Sleeve, the high-speed trials began in late 1943. During the program, Squadron Leader J R Tobin took a Mark XI Spitfire into a 45-degree dive; the plane reached a top speed of just over six hundred mph , or Mach 0.89 (Mach 1 being the technical term for the speed of sound). It was the fastest a Spitfire had ever flown or, at least, the fastest that a pilot had lived to tell the tale. But a far more dramatic flight was soon to take place.
In April of 1944, Squadron Leader Anthony F Martindale, put the exact same Mark XI Spitfire into a dive. This time, the reduction gear designed to limit its speed failed. The propeller ripped off, and the diving aircraft reached more than six hundred miles an hour, or Mach 0.92, as it plunged towards the ground.
Martindale was saved by simple physics. With the heavy propellers wrenched off, the aircraft was now tail-heavy, and this change in the center of gravity forced it to climb up from the dive at great speed. Martindale was knocked unconscious from the stress of the climb, and woke to find his aircraft flying at forty thousand feet. Somehow he managed to glide the aircraft back to his base, and emerged unscathed. The stress of the plane’s dive had bent the wings, giving them a slightly swept shape, the kind of shape that would eventually help other aircraft travel through the sound barrier.
This warping would have been caused by the airflow over the wing as the plane picked up speed, explains Rod Irvine, the Royal Aeronautical Society’s aerodynamics group chairman. “When you start approaching Mach 0.85 or 0.95, what happens is you get this subsonic flow over the wing, and it starts to accelerate beyond the sound barrier,” he says. “It starts to flick around all over the place, and it feels like the aircraft is starting to shake itself to bits, because you get this fundamental change in the aerodynamics.” Irvine says this problem remains today; airliners such as the Airbus A380 will travel as fast as they can without causing the air flowing over the wings to reach supersonic speed, which can create vibrations and buffeting.
Planes like the Spitfire had another big problem: the propeller itself. Older aircraft had a propeller that was directly connected to the engine; more power meant the propellers would spin faster and faster. Even with a plane traveling under three hundred miles an house, the air traveling over these fast-spinning blades could reach supersonic speeds. The shock waves formed from this air traveling so fast over the propeller blades then added drag, buffeting and noise.
Jeremy Kinney, a curator at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum in Washington DC, says the Spitfire’s designer, RJ Mitchell, had understood some of the issues around propellers from designing racing airplanes in the early 1920s.
“Say you’re standing under one of those racing planes at an air racing event at Cowes on the Isle of Wight in 1923,” says Kinney, “you’d hear this banging and clanking as the aircraft went overhead. That’s the tips of the propellers going supersonic.” Mitchell and his contemporaries realized simply connecting a propeller so it spun faster and faster wouldn’t necessarily help an aircraft go faster and faster. Variable pitch propellers, where the propeller would automatically match the RPM of the engine, were much more efficient and helped planes like the Spitfire fly much faster.
But only so fast, says Kinney. “The combination of the piston engine and the propeller are a kind of symbolic limitation of ever-increasing speed,” he says. “And it builds the case for how monumental the turbojet revolution was. You can only get a piston engine to do so many revolutions per minute. There was this paradigm, at least for the first half of the twentieth century, that planes had to go higher, faster, and further. The work required to make a propeller that could work through the supersonic regime was just too much,” says Kinney. “And why try, when the jet engine suddenly gives you that capability?”
Those high-speed dives in Spitfires and other Allied fighter planes, like the American P-51 Mustang and P-47 Thunderbolt, helped researchers glimpse the kind of challenges supersonic flight would bring. It led to the development of a different aircraft shape, one that could deal with the shockwaves created on the way to the sound barrier. A pointed nose, smaller wings, and a smooth fuselage that limited the effect of the shockwaves. A lot like Yeager’s Bell X-1, for example:

Rico says it's yet another job he's glad he never had...