Rico's rants: 2016.07

When Donald Trump called for Russia to hack into Hillary Clinton's emails, the GOP nominee's remarks touched off a predictable media firestorm. Here was a presidential candidate from a major American party encouraging a foreign government to target American interests with cyberspying; an act that could not only expose national security information, but also potentially undermine the actual security infrastructure of the United States.
Cyberwarriors working for Moscow and other regimes are already poking and prodding at our networks, so there's little reason to think Trump's words were all that damaging in themselves. But it's a good opportunity to talk about the state of state-sponsored hacking, and to offer a reminder that the United States is just as active in this space as the next government.
The US approach to this digital battleground is pretty advanced. For example: did you know that the military uses its submarines as underwater hacking platforms?
In fact, subs represent an important component of America's cyber strategy. They act defensively to protect themselves and the country from digital attack, but, more interestingly, they also have a role to play in carrying out cyberattacks, according to two Navy officials at a recent Washington conference.
"There is an offensive capability that we are, that we prize very highly," said Rear Admiral Michael Jabaley, the Navy's program executive officer for submarines. "And this is where I really can't talk about much, but suffice to say that we have submarines out there on the front lines that are very involved, at the highest technical level, doing exactly the kind of things that you would want them to do."
The so-called "silent service" has a long history of using information technology to gain an edge on America's rivals. In the 1970s, the government instructed its submarines to tap undersea communications cables off the Russian coast, recording the messages being relayed back and forth between then-Soviet forces. (The National Security Agency has continued that tradition, monitoring underwater fiber cables as part of its globe-spanning intelligence-gathering apparatus. In some cases, the government has struck closed-door deals with the cable operators ensuring that our spies can gain secure access to the information traveling over those pipes.)
These days, some subs come equipped with sophisticated antennas that can be used to intercept and manipulate other people's communications traffic, particularly on weak or unencrypted networks.
"We've gone where our targets have gone", that is to say, online, said Stewart Baker, the NSA's former general counsel, in an interview. "Only the most security-conscious now are completely cut off from the Internet." Cyberattacks are also much easier to carry out than to defend against, he said.
One of America's premier hacker subs, the USS Annapolis, is hooked into a much wider spying net that was disclosed as part of the 2013 Edward Snowden leaks, according to Adam Weinstein and William Arkin, writing last year for Gawker's intelligence and national security blog, Phase Zero. A leaked slide showed that in a typical week, the Navy performs hundreds of so-called "computer network exploitations", many of which are likely the result of submarine-based hacking.
"Annapolis and its sister ships are the infiltrators of the new new of cyber warfare," wrote Arkin and Weinstein, "getting close to the enemy, inside their defensive zones, to jam and emit and spoof and hack. They do this through mast-mounted antennas and collection systems atop the conning tower, some of them one-of-a-kind devices made for hard to reach or specific targets, all of them black boxes of future war."
But even this doesn't compare to what the Navy wants to be able to do next: turn its submarines into motherships for underwater drones that can maneuver themselves even closer to shore and conduct jamming or hacking operations while allowing the sub to work at a distance.
"We want the boat to grow longer arms," said Rear Admiral Charles Richard, director of the Navy's undersea warfare division. "We are at all-ahead flank, both on unmanned aerial and undersea vehicles."
It's unclear how far behind or ahead other navies may be when it comes to submarine-based cyber offense. Many of the cybersecurity and military experts we interviewed for this story had hardly heard of the Defense Department's own undersea cyber capabilities.
But, Baker said, "espionage is a game where there's a lot of following the leader, so it's perfectly possible it's happening in this field as well."
What is clear is that the US military operates some of the most sophisticated information networks ever designed, and it's using them to penetrate foreign computer systems as part of an evolving cyber strategy.
We may never know precisely what dirt the Pentagon is digging up with its submarine espionage, or be able to draw a link between it and any political or military events in the real world. But despite the rising prominence of Russian hackers in this news cycle, and Chinese hackers before that, it's worth pointing out that the United States has grown fairly proficient in cyberspace, too.

Rico says it's legal when the gummint does it...

NASA’s new space plane is getting ready to take flight - The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/07/29/nasas-new-space-plane-is-getting-ready-to-take-flight/?wpisrc=nl_az_most

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

Russia accuses Google Maps of ‘topographical cretinism’ - The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/07/29/russia-accuses-google-maps-of-topographical-cretinism/?wpisrc=nl_az_most

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

History for the day: 1945: Indianapolis torpedoed

On 30 July 1945, the USS Indianapolis (photo, top), which had just delivered key components of the first atomic bomb, to be dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, to the Pacific island of Tinian, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine. Only 316 out of 1,196 men survived the sinking into shark-infested waters.

NRA-ILA | Hillary Clinton and Establishment Democrats Embrace Gun Control at Philadelphia Convention

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20160729/hillary-clinton-and-establishment-democrats-embrace-gun-control-at-philadelphia-convention

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

29 July 2016

Keira Knightley

Rico says another luscious brunette:

Keira Knightley
Keira Christina Knightley was born in the South West Greater London suburb of Richmond on March 26th 1985. She is the daughter of actor Will Knightley…

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0461136/

Sent from the IMDb iPhone app.
www.imdb.com | IMDb on Facebook | IMDb on Twitter

Sent from my iPhone

Mark Seymour

215.866.6184

mseymour@proofmark.com

BBC - Future - Leonardo da Vinci's lessons in design genius

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160727-leon?ocid=global_future_rss&ocid=global_bbccom_email_28072016_future

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

Model 1894 vs. AK47 UF

John Dean “Jeff” Cooper is an iconic figure in the gun world. He is perhaps best known for promoting The Modern Technique of the Pistol, i.e. the idea that holding it with two hands will allow for faster and more accurate defensive shooting. He is also well known for loving the 1911, hating the 9mm, and developing the Scout Rifle concept.
One fact about him which may not be as well known is that he is the main reason most tactical shotguns on the market are equipped with ghost ring sights. Cooper used them on dangerous game rifles in Africa, put them on his Scout rifles, and transferred the concept to shotguns intended for anti-personnel use.
He also promoted the use of ghost ring sights on other platforms as well. I remember reading years ago how he pitted a Winchester 1894 .30-30 lever-action rifle against an AK47. According to Cooper, out to 25 yards, the AK47 was faster (one round per target), but beyond that, the Winchester lever-action with ghost ring sights held its own.
Suppressive fire? Ability to reload quickly? That’s not what we’re talking about here. This is all about putting rounds on target. Of course, the Winchester is much slower to reload than an AK and holds fewer rounds, but this exercise was all about shooting.
How could an AK47 possibly be beaten by a lever-action rifle? The common sense answer lies in both the sights and realistic target engagement scenarios. Let’s talk scenarios first: in an actual gunfight where you need a rifle (and we’re talking private citizens in defensive shooting situations here, not military engagements), you will not have eight bad guys lining up in a nice row like you see in Three-Gun competition.
If there is even more than one bad actor (unlikely), they will be spread apart, probably moving fast or hiding behind cover, and you may only get one shot at them at a time. Therefore, the rapid follow-up shots provided by a semi-auto rifle aren’t nearly as important as you might think when it comes to getting hits on target.
Then there are the sights. The main complaint about the AK47 has always been its rather crude sights. Not the design specifically, because the rifle has a functional rear notch and post front, but rather the sight radius. The distance between the front and rear sights is so short as to make engaging targets at distance much more difficult than would be the case if you were wielding just about any other rifle in the field at the time the AK47 was introduced.
I never had any reason not to take Cooper at his word, and his brief comment on the subject is the main reason why, twenty years ago, I found myself the proud new owner of a Winchester 1894 in .30-30. I promptly took it to the well-known Williams Gun Sight in Davison, Michigan, where the company installed its adjustable rear receiver sight. This rear receiver sight has interchangeable screw-in peep inserts, but if you don’t put in an insert, the rear sight housing itself becomes a ghost ring.
That rifle is still in my possession, and I’ll probably pass it down to my children. It should be no surprise that I’ve taken it deer hunting in northwestern Michigan. What might be surprising is that, for ten years, it was my truck gun, for those situations where a pistol just wouldn’t be enough.
Sound crazy? How many of you are carrying either a .380 Auto or a revolver for self-defense? One is an underpowered cartridge, the other an antiquated design even older than the Winchester. Do you feel undergunned?
Like I said, I never had any reason to doubt Cooper’s findings, even though the idea of a lever-action gun beating the world’s most famous assault rifle at any distance might seem counterintuitive. But why take someone’s word when testing it for yourself gives you an excuse to head to the range and shoot one of your favorite rifles?
The Winchester 1894 was designed in that year by none other than John M. Browning. Like just about every other firearm he designed, it is very ergonomic and size efficient, and points very naturally.
It was originally designed to fire metallic blackpowder cartridges, then the smokeless .30 WCF (Winchester Center Fire) which was later renamed the .30-30 by Marlin because they didn’t want to give Winchester any free publicity. The .30-30 name stuck.
This rifle has been chambered in numerous calibers, but, in .30-30, the tubular magazine holds six cartridges. With a twenty-inch barrel, it is 38 inches long overall and weighs just under seven pounds. It is very narrow; the buttstock is wider than the receiver.
My Winchester 1894 is a Centennial Edition, put out in 1994. The receiver is marked 1894–1994. It unfortunately sports the completely unnecessary cross-bolt safety in the receiver (not part of Browning’s original design), which came about in 1992 when then-owners FN Herstal wanted a rifle that could be sold internationally.
Luckily, the body of the rear receiver sight not just protects the ugly safety sticking out the left side of the gun, but does a good job of blocking it from view. The wood on my specimen is a bit plain. Apart from replacing the rear sight, the only thing I’ve done to customize this rifle is attach a leather side-saddle made by Galco. It holds five cartridges and looks very cowboy tactical.
Ironically, the standard rear sight on a Winchester 1894 is a forward-mounted notch on the barrel, not unlike what you see with the AK47. Sight radius with the factory rear sight is about seventeen inches. The Williams receiver sight increases the sight radius, and replaces the cruder open sight with a peep sight adjustable for windage and elevation. With the smaller apertures unscrewed, the body of the peep makes a perfect ghost ring, and has an aperture .22 of an inch wide, according to my calipers.
The front sight on my Winchester 1894 is a one-piece blued steel post that narrows at the top, tipped with a ball. Apparently, this is called a “barleycorn” type front sight. The post is .085 of an inch wide just below the ball, and the ball is .1 of an inch wide, and the top of the front sight is .5 of an inch above the barrel.
A ghost ring sighting system works just like a standard rear peep sight but, because the rear aperture is larger, it is quicker to use, albeit less precise at distance. The larger aperture tends to blur or ghost out as you look through it and focus on the front sight.
How big is the rear aperture? While looking through it with a proper sight picture, not only can I see the entire front sight post, I can see the entire barrel leading up to the front sight.
You never burn through thousands of rounds in a lever-action, and I probably didn’t have much more than a hundred rounds through the rifle all told before I pulled it out of the safe for this article. Trigger pull on my specimen was two-stage; a very light takeup with a crisp break, with a total weight of seven pounds. Not exactly target grade, but perfectly acceptable for the design.
The AK47 hardly needs any introduction to any Firearms News reader. According to the then-Soviet propaganda machine, it was designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov, a World War Two tank hero with no firearms design or engineering experience. Chambered in the 7.62x39mm cartridge, the original AK47 was a select-fire gas piston operated rifle. It is the most widely produced military rifle in the world.
Semi-auto versions of the AK47 have been available in the US for more than thirty years, in many different configurations. For this article, I wanted to use a rifle that would be similar to what Jeff Cooper had available in the mid-1980s.
I own a Norinco AK47, but it was out of consideration because I replaced the rear sight with a rear peep sight made by Tech-Sights mounted at the rear of the receiver, nearly doubling the sight radius and making it much easier to shoot the rifle accurately.
I ended up borrowing a Chinese-made Poly Tech AK47 imported by KFS. It sports a folding spike bayonet, plain muzzle at the end of a 16.3-inch barrel and nicely varnished wood. Just as factory triggers on AR-15s generally suck, factory triggers on AKs tend to be very nice. The trigger on the Poly Tech AK was a single stage, with a long smooth pull, total weight 3.75 pounds—much lighter than my Winchester 1894.
model-winchester-ak47-vs-1894-7
The ’94 was completely reliable, and one look here should tell you why—controlled feeding. When the nose of the next round pops up it is almost inside the chamber.
This AK47 ran close to 9 pounds empty, and was shorter than the Winchester 1894 at 34.25 inches. The factory rear sight was the standard notch adjustable for elevation out to 800 meters. The front sight is a post about .11 of an inch wide. Distance between the front and rear sight is a mere 15 inches.
While it is possible with these sights to ring steel silhouettes out to 300 meters with regularity from a steady rest…it is not easy. Personally I would class the sights on an AK47 more appropriate for use on an SMG than a front-line assault rifle, but the Soviets have a much different philosophy with regards to their soldiers than, say, the U.S. Marine Corps.
A distance of 23.5 inches on the Winchester 1894 versus 15 inches on the AK47 means that the sight radius of the Winchester 1894 is 57 percent longer. Add to that the fact that the Winchester’s front sight is narrower and it is not hard to see that simply from looking at the numbers, it would seem that the Winchester 1894 would be capable of more precise aimed fire, all else being equal.
Let’s talk cartridges. The original Soviet 7.62x39mm load features a 123-grain bullet that exits the muzzle of an AK at about 2350 fps. Most commercial loads available today are very similar to that, and for this test I chose to use Wolf Military Classic ammunition. This steel-cased ammunition features a 124-grain hollow-point bullet, and out of the Poly Tech AK47, it chronographed at 2314 fps.
1894-ak47-model-vs-winchester-8
The AK’s rear notch sight is adjustable out to 800 meters but tends to block a lot of the view downrange, especially when shooting at distant targets.
There are two common bullet weights for the .30-30 Winchester 1894: 150 and 170 grains. For this article, Winchester very graciously supplied me with ammunition in both bullet weights. Heck, it only seemed right to use Winchester ammunition in a Winchester rifle. This was Winchester Super-X ammo loaded with Power-Point bullets (jacketed soft points). Untold tens of thousands of deer have been killed with this and functionally identical ammunition over the last hundred years.
I chronographed both loads. Out of the Winchester’s 20-inch barrel, the 170-grain Power-Point averaged 2152 fps. The 150-grain load averaged 2336 fps, almost the exact same velocity as the 7.62x39mm Wolf ammo exiting the AK, so I decided to use that bullet weight in my testing. Both loads had about the same felt recoil in the Winchester 1894.
When it came time to test the rifles, I had some decisions to make. I elected to use standard cardboard silhouettes, and to engage them from 25, 50, and 100 yards. One round per target, and any hit on paper counted.
As for how many targets to shoot at each time….I decided on four. I varied their heights off the ground by several feet and spaced them irregularly so I would be required to actually acquire each target and not just time my trigger pulls with my swing.
vs-model-ak47-1894-winchester-9
The numbers say it all—the AK is more handicapped by its short sight radius than it is by the sights themselves. Functional for combat, and that’s about it.
Each run began with the rifle at low ready, and I recorded the times using a Competition Electronics Pocket Pro shot timer. Shooting at 25 and 50 yards was done offhand, while I rested my forearm on a wooden support (the kind of expedient rest you might find and use in the field) when shooting at 100 yards.
Felt recoil was stiffer on the Winchester 1894, and the trigger pull was heavier, but as soon as I raised both rifles at the 25-yard line I could see how much superior the sights were on the Winchester 1894.
The initial runs were done with the four targets placed rather close together in a 5-yard spread. At 25 yards, the AK47 was noticeably quicker, an average 3.2 seconds per run versus 3.75 for the Winchester 1894. The softer recoil and smooth trigger really helped.
At 50 yards I had to spend more time on target acquisition, sight alignment, and trigger control for both rifles, but the AK47 was still faster with an average 4.25 seconds per run versus 4.5 for the Winchester.
ak47-model-vs-1894-winchester-10
Tarr deliberately chose to use an AK without a muzzle device, just to keep things fair. The spike bayonet is always useful to have if beset by imperialist hordes.
In case you’re wondering, working the lever of the Winchester 1894 is actually very instinctual. Even though it had been years since I last fired the rifle, it only took me a few runs to get up to speed. Many cowboy action shooters use customized lever-action rifles, where the throw of the lever has been shortened so much their hand barely has to come off the wood to jack the next round in, but the action of my rifle is bone stock.
The lever has to go past the vertical for full travel, and yet it can be worked surprisingly quickly—at silhouette targets 10 yards away, it’s easy to fire one aimed round every three-quarters of a second once you get in the groove. Keep the rifle up to the shoulder and use vigor when working the lever, much like you would when utilizing a pump shotgun (another antiquated weapon).
Shooting at 100 yards, the light trigger on the AK47 was very valuable, but not as valuable as the improved sights on the Winchester 1894. My runs with the Winchester were consistently .1 second faster than the AK47.
At 100 yards with the Winchester 1894, my main concern was a controlled squeeze of the trigger. With the AK47 at that distance…to be honest that wide rear notch really obscures a lot of the target area, and slowed me down, whereas with the ghost ring-equipped Winchester I had no problem seeing everything. I found the ghost ring rear sight just allowed for quicker target engagement at 50 yards and beyond.
winchester-ak47-vs-1894-model-11
Tarr chose common ammunition—Wolf Classic steel cased 124-grain HPs, and Winchester 150-grain JSP Power-Points. Both loads had nearly identical velocities.
But…those first runs were with the four targets placed rather close together, which is a lot more like a shooting exercise than what you’d see in real life (unless like someone I know who witnessed human wave attacks while fighting in Korea). Instead of a 5-yard spread, for my next test I dragged the targets farther apart, so they were 15 yards from end-to-end.
With the targets farther apart, even at 25 yards, there was barely any time wasted working the lever of the Winchester 1894, as it was done while transitioning between targets. The better trigger and lower recoil of the AK47 kept it in the lead at 25 yards, but just barely, and that lead vanished when I moved out to 50 yards and beyond.
So, yes, in my limited testing, I reproduced Jeff Cooper’s results—when engaging individual targets with one round each, at 50 yards and beyond, a Winchester 1894 with a ghost ring rear sight cannot just keep up with an AK47 but beat it.
This was definitely a fun exercise and illuminating. As far as reliability, the vaunted AK47 actually jammed a couple of times on one of my steel Chinese magazines. The only problem I had with the Winchester 1894 was me short-stroking the lever once and not chambering
a round.
With targets close together, the AK had an advantage out to 50 yards. With the targets spread, the Winchester beat the AK at both 50 and 100 yards.
I felt a little like a cowboy, getting the barrel of a Winchester 1894 too hot to touch, working the lever so much a healed cut on my hand started to bleed. I’m sure if any ladies had been in the area, they would have remarked at how manly I looked…maybe swooned.
Out of curiosity, I ran through the same shooting exercises with a red dot-equipped AR15. I found that I was at least 30 percent faster with the lower recoiling optically sighted black rifle. I’m not sure how fair the comparison is, considering the AR is a .223, not a .30, and as a design is 20 years younger than the AK47 (and 70 years younger than the Winchester 1894.).
Am I saying the Winchester 1894 is as useful in combat as an AK47? No. Nothing of the sort. But, cowboy, someday you may find yourself trapped inside or behind your fallen steed (Bronco, Mustang, etc.). If you have time to get to a rifle, that means the circling Indians aren’t right on top of you.
If that’s the case, my limited testing showed me that a Winchester 1894 probably won’t be a handicap when compared to an AK47, either in the accuracy or speed department, at distances of fifty yards and more.

An interesting comparison by James Tarr in Firearms News, but Rico says he'll still take the 1894...

Model 1894 vs. AK47 UF

John Dean “Jeff” Cooper is an iconic figure in the gun world. He is perhaps best known for promoting The Modern Technique of the Pistol, i.e. the idea that holding it with two hands will allow for faster more accurate defensive shooting. He is also well known for loving the 1911, hating the 9mm cartridge and developing the Scout Rifle concept.
One fact about him which may not be as well known is that he is the main reason most tactical shotguns on the market are equipped with ghost ring sights. Cooper used them on dangerous game rifles in Africa, put them on his Scout rifles, and transferred the concept to shotguns intended for anti-personnel use.
He also promoted the use of ghost ring sights on other platforms as well. I remember reading years ago how he pitted a Winchester 1894 .30-30 lever-action rifle against an AK47. According to Cooper, out to 25 yards, the AK47 was faster (one round per target), but beyond that, the Winchester lever-action with ghost ring sights held its own.
Suppressive fire? Ability to reload quickly? That’s not what we’re talking about here. This is all about putting rounds on target. Of course, the Winchester is much slower to reload than an AK and holds fewer rounds, but this exercise was all about shooting.
How could an AK47 possibly be beaten by a lever-action rifle? The common sense answer lies in both the sights and realistic target engagement scenarios. Let’s talk scenarios first: in an actual gunfight where you need a rifle (and we’re talking private citizens in defensive shooting situations here, not military engagements), you will not have eight bad guys lining up in a row like you see in Three-Gun competition.
If there is even more than one bad actor (unlikely), they will be spread apart, probably moving fast or hiding behind cover, and you may only get one shot at them at a time. Therefore, the rapid follow-up shots provided by a semi-auto rifle aren’t nearly as important as you might think when it comes to getting hits on target.
Then there are the sights. The main complaint about the AK47 has always been its rather crude sights. Not the design specifically, because the rifle has a functional rear notch and post front, but rather the sight radius. The distance between the front and rear sights is so short as to make engaging targets at distance much more difficult than would be the case if you were wielding just about any other rifle in the field at the time the AK47 was introduced.
I never had any reason not to take Cooper at his word, and his brief comment on the subject is the main reason why, 20 years ago, I found myself the proud new owner of a Winchester 1894 in .30-30. I promptly took it to the well-known Williams Gun Sight in Davison, Mich., where the company installed its adjustable rear receiver sight. This rear receiver sight has interchangeable screw-in peep inserts…but if you don’t put in an insert, the rear sight housing itself becomes a ghost ring.
1894-vs-ak47-winchester-model-3
The AK used was a loaner, a Chinese Poly Tech AK with spike bayonet. It had an excellent trigger, but like all AKs was a bit handicapped by its sights.
That rifle is still in my possession, and I’ll probably pass it down to my children. It should be no surprise that I’ve taken it deer hunting in northwestern Michigan. What might be surprising is that, for 10 years, it was my truck gun, for those situations where a pistol just wouldn’t be enough.
Sound crazy? How many of you are carrying either a .380 Auto or a revolver for self-defense? One is an underpowered cartridge, the other an antiquated design even older than the Winchester. Do you feel undergunned?
Like I said, I never had any reason to doubt Cooper’s findings, even though the idea of a lever-action gun beating the world’s most famous assault rifle at any distance might seem counterintuitive. But why take someone’s word when testing it for yourself gives you an excuse to head to the range and shoot one of your favorite rifles?
The Winchester 1894 was designed in that year by none other than John M. Browning. Like just about every other firearm he designed, it is very ergonomic and size efficient, and points very naturally.
It was originally designed to fire metallic blackpowder cartridges, then the smokeless .30 WCF (Winchester Center Fire) which was later renamed the .30-30 by Marlin because they didn’t want to give Winchester any free publicity. The .30-30 name stuck.
vs-ak47-winchester-model-1894-4
The rear receiver sight on the Winchester 1894 is from Williams Gun Sight and accepts interchangeable peep inserts. If you leave them out, the end result is a ghost-ring type aperture.
This rifle has been chambered in numerous calibers, but in .30-30 the tubular magazine holds six cartridges. With a 20-inch barrel, it is 38 inches long overall and weighs 6.8 lbs. It is very narrow; the buttstock is wider than the receiver.
My Winchester 1894 is a Centennial Edition put out in 1994. The receiver is marked 1894–1994. It unfortunately sports the completely unnecessary crossbolt safety in the receiver (not part of Browning’s original design), which came about in 1992 when then owners FN Herstal wanted a rifle that could be sold internationally.
Luckily, the body of the rear receiver sight not just protects the ugly safety sticking out the left side of the gun, but does a good job of blocking it from view. The wood on my specimen is a bit plain. Apart from replacing the rear sight, the only thing I’ve done to customize this rifle is attach a leather side-saddle made by Galco. It holds five cartridges and looks very cowboy tactical.
Ironically, the standard rear sight on a Winchester 1894 is a forward-mounted notch, on the barrel, not unlike what you see with the AK47. Sight radius with the factory rear sight is about 17 inches. The Williams receiver sight increases the sight radius to 23.5 inches, and replaces the cruder open sight with a peep sight adjustable for windage and elevation. With the smaller apertures unscrewed, the body of the peep makes a perfect ghost ring, and has an aperture .22 of an inch wide, according to my calipers.
ak47-winchester-model-1894-vs-5
The “barleycorn” front sight on the Winchester is narrower than the front sight on the AK. It worked very well in combination with the rear ghost ring.
The front sight on my Winchester 1894 is a one-piece blued steel post that narrows at the top, tipped with a ball. Apparently, this is called a “barleycorn” type front sight. The post is .085 of an inch wide just below the ball, and the ball is .1 of an inch wide, and the top of the front sight is .5 of an inch above the barrel.
A ghost ring sighting system works just like a standard rear peep sight, but because the rear aperture is larger, it is quicker to use, albeit less precise at distance. The larger aperture tends to blur or ghost out as you look through it and focus on the front sight.
How big is the rear aperture? While looking through it with a proper sight picture not only can I see the entire front sight post, I can see the entire barrel leading up to the front sight.
You never burn through thousands of rounds in a lever-action, and I probably didn’t have much more than 100–150 rounds through the rifle all told before I pulled it out of the safe for this article. Trigger pull on my specimen was two-stage—a very light takeup with a crisp break, with a total weight of 7 lbs. Not exactly target grade, but perfectly acceptable for the design.
winchester-1894-model-ak47-vs-6
Tarr’s Winchester is a Centennial Model produced in 1994. He regards it unfortunate that it sports a crossbolt receiver safety, not found in the original ’94.
The AK47 hardly needs any introduction to any Firearms News reader. According to the Soviet propaganda machine, it was designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov, a World War II tank hero with no firearms design or engineering experience. Chambered in the 7.62x39mm cartridge, the original AK47 was a select-fire gas piston operated rifle. It is the most widely produced military rifle in the world.
Semi-auto versions of the AK47 have been available in the U.S. for more than 30 years, in many different configurations. For this article, I wanted to use a rifle that would be similar to what Jeff Cooper had available in the mid-80s.
I own a Norinco AK47, but it was out of consideration because I replaced the rear sight with a rear peep sight made by Tech-Sights mounted at the rear of the receiver, nearly doubling the sight radius and making it much easier to shoot the rifle accurately.
I ended up borrowing a Chinese-made Poly Tech AK47 imported by KFS. It sports a folding spike bayonet, plain muzzle at the end of a 16.3-inch barrel and nicely varnished wood. Just as factory triggers on AR-15s generally suck, factory triggers on AKs tend to be very nice. The trigger on the Poly Tech AK was a single stage, with a long smooth pull, total weight 3.75 pounds—much lighter than my Winchester 1894.
model-winchester-ak47-vs-1894-7
The ’94 was completely reliable, and one look here should tell you why—controlled feeding. When the nose of the next round pops up it is almost inside the chamber.
This AK47 ran close to 9 pounds empty, and was shorter than the Winchester 1894 at 34.25 inches. The factory rear sight was the standard notch adjustable for elevation out to 800 meters. The front sight is a post about .11 of an inch wide. Distance between the front and rear sight is a mere 15 inches.
While it is possible with these sights to ring steel silhouettes out to 300 meters with regularity from a steady rest…it is not easy. Personally I would class the sights on an AK47 more appropriate for use on an SMG than a front-line assault rifle, but the Soviets have a much different philosophy with regards to their soldiers than, say, the U.S. Marine Corps.
A distance of 23.5 inches on the Winchester 1894 versus 15 inches on the AK47 means that the sight radius of the Winchester 1894 is 57 percent longer. Add to that the fact that the Winchester’s front sight is narrower and it is not hard to see that simply from looking at the numbers, it would seem that the Winchester 1894 would be capable of more precise aimed fire, all else being equal.
Let’s talk cartridges. The original Soviet 7.62x39mm load features a 123-grain bullet that exits the muzzle of an AK at about 2350 fps. Most commercial loads available today are very similar to that, and for this test I chose to use Wolf Military Classic ammunition. This steel-cased ammunition features a 124-grain hollow-point bullet, and out of the Poly Tech AK47, it chronographed at 2314 fps.
1894-ak47-model-vs-winchester-8
The AK’s rear notch sight is adjustable out to 800 meters but tends to block a lot of the view downrange, especially when shooting at distant targets.
There are two common bullet weights for the .30-30 Winchester 1894: 150 and 170 grains. For this article, Winchester very graciously supplied me with ammunition in both bullet weights. Heck, it only seemed right to use Winchester ammunition in a Winchester rifle. This was Winchester Super-X ammo loaded with Power-Point bullets (jacketed soft points). Untold tens of thousands of deer have been killed with this and functionally identical ammunition over the last hundred years.
I chronographed both loads. Out of the Winchester’s 20-inch barrel, the 170-grain Power-Point averaged 2152 fps. The 150-grain load averaged 2336 fps, almost the exact same velocity as the 7.62x39mm Wolf ammo exiting the AK, so I decided to use that bullet weight in my testing. Both loads had about the same felt recoil in the Winchester 1894.
When it came time to test the rifles, I had some decisions to make. I elected to use standard cardboard silhouettes, and to engage them from 25, 50, and 100 yards. One round per target, and any hit on paper counted.
As for how many targets to shoot at each time….I decided on four. I varied their heights off the ground by several feet and spaced them irregularly so I would be required to actually acquire each target and not just time my trigger pulls with my swing.
vs-model-ak47-1894-winchester-9
The numbers say it all—the AK is more handicapped by its short sight radius than it is by the sights themselves. Functional for combat, and that’s about it.
Each run began with the rifle at low ready, and I recorded the times using a Competition Electronics Pocket Pro shot timer. Shooting at 25 and 50 yards was done offhand, while I rested my forearm on a wooden support (the kind of expedient rest you might find and use in the field) when shooting at 100 yards.
Felt recoil was stiffer on the Winchester 1894, and the trigger pull was heavier, but as soon as I raised both rifles at the 25-yard line I could see how much superior the sights were on the Winchester 1894.
The initial runs were done with the four targets placed rather close together in a 5-yard spread. At 25 yards, the AK47 was noticeably quicker, an average 3.2 seconds per run versus 3.75 for the Winchester 1894. The softer recoil and smooth trigger really helped.
At 50 yards I had to spend more time on target acquisition, sight alignment, and trigger control for both rifles, but the AK47 was still faster with an average 4.25 seconds per run versus 4.5 for the Winchester.
ak47-model-vs-1894-winchester-10
Tarr deliberately chose to use an AK without a muzzle device, just to keep things fair. The spike bayonet is always useful to have if beset by imperialist hordes.
In case you’re wondering, working the lever of the Winchester 1894 is actually very instinctual. Even though it had been years since I last fired the rifle, it only took me a few runs to get up to speed. Many cowboy action shooters use customized lever-action rifles, where the throw of the lever has been shortened so much their hand barely has to come off the wood to jack the next round in, but the action of my rifle is bone stock.
The lever has to go past the vertical for full travel, and yet it can be worked surprisingly quickly—at silhouette targets 10 yards away, it’s easy to fire one aimed round every three-quarters of a second once you get in the groove. Keep the rifle up to the shoulder and use vigor when working the lever, much like you would when utilizing a pump shotgun (another antiquated weapon).
Shooting at 100 yards, the light trigger on the AK47 was very valuable, but not as valuable as the improved sights on the Winchester 1894. My runs with the Winchester were consistently .1 second faster than the AK47.
At 100 yards with the Winchester 1894, my main concern was a controlled squeeze of the trigger. With the AK47 at that distance…to be honest that wide rear notch really obscures a lot of the target area, and slowed me down, whereas with the ghost ring-equipped Winchester I had no problem seeing everything. I found the ghost ring rear sight just allowed for quicker target engagement at 50 yards and beyond.
winchester-ak47-vs-1894-model-11
Tarr chose common ammunition—Wolf Classic steel cased 124-grain HPs, and Winchester 150-grain JSP Power-Points. Both loads had nearly identical velocities.
But…those first runs were with the four targets placed rather close together, which is a lot more like a shooting exercise than what you’d see in real life (unless like someone I know who witnessed human wave attacks while fighting in Korea). Instead of a 5-yard spread, for my next test I dragged the targets farther apart, so they were 15 yards from end-to-end.
With the targets farther apart, even at 25 yards, there was barely any time wasted working the lever of the Winchester 1894, as it was done while transitioning between targets. The better trigger and lower recoil of the AK47 kept it in the lead at 25 yards, but just barely, and that lead vanished when I moved out to 50 yards and beyond.
So, yes, in my limited testing, I reproduced Jeff Cooper’s results—when engaging individual targets with one round each, at 50 yards and beyond, a Winchester 1894 with a ghost ring rear sight cannot just keep up with an AK47 but beat it.
This was definitely a fun exercise and illuminating. As far as reliability, the vaunted AK47 actually jammed a couple of times on one of my steel Chinese magazines. The only problem I had with the Winchester 1894 was me short-stroking the lever once and not chambering
a round.
With targets close together, the AK had an advantage out to 50 yards. With the targets spread, the Winchester beat the AK at both 50 and 100 yards.
I felt a little like a cowboy, getting the barrel of a Winchester 1894 too hot to touch, working the lever so much a healed cut on my hand started to bleed. I’m sure if any ladies had been in the area, they would have remarked at how manly I looked…maybe swooned.
Out of curiosity, I ran through the same shooting exercises with a red dot-equipped AR15. I found that I was at least 30 percent faster with the lower recoiling optically sighted black rifle. I’m not sure how fair the comparison is, considering the AR is a .223, not a .30, and as a design is 20 years younger than the AK47 (and 70 years younger than the Winchester 1894.).
Am I saying the Winchester 1894 is as useful in combat as an AK47? No. Nothing of the sort. But, cowboy, someday you may find yourself trapped inside or behind your fallen steed (Bronco, Mustang, etc.). If you have time to get to a rifle, that means the circling Indians aren’t right on top of you.
If that’s the case, my limited testing showed me that a Winchester 1894 probably won’t be a handicap when compared to an AK47, either in the accuracy or speed department, at distances of fifty yards and more.

An interesting comparison by James Tarr in Firearms News, but Rico says he'll still take the 1894...

Model 1894 vs. AK47 UF

John Dean “Jeff” Cooper is an iconic figure in the gun world. He is perhaps best known for promoting The Modern Technique of the Pistol, i.e. the idea that holding it with two hands will allow for faster more accurate defensive shooting. He is also well known for loving the 1911, hating the 9mm cartridge and developing the Scout Rifle concept.
One fact about him which may not be as well known is that he is the main reason most tactical shotguns on the market are equipped with ghost ring sights. Cooper used them on dangerous game rifles in Africa, put them on his Scout rifles, and transferred the concept to shotguns intended for anti-personnel use.
He also promoted the use of ghost ring sights on other platforms as well. I remember reading years ago how he pitted a Winchester 1894 .30-30 lever-action rifle against an AK47. According to Cooper, out to 25 yards, the AK47 was faster (one round per target), but beyond that, the Winchester lever-action with ghost ring sights held its own.
Suppressive fire? Ability to reload quickly? That’s not what we’re talking about here. This is all about putting rounds on target. Of course, the Winchester is much slower to reload than an AK and holds fewer rounds, but this exercise was all about shooting.
How could an AK47 possibly be beaten by a lever-action rifle? The common sense answer lies in both the sights and realistic target engagement scenarios. Let’s talk scenarios first: in an actual gunfight where you need a rifle (and we’re talking private citizens in defensive shooting situations here, not military engagements), you will not have eight bad guys lining up in a row like you see in Three-Gun competition.
If there is even more than one bad actor (unlikely), they will be spread apart, probably moving fast or hiding behind cover, and you may only get one shot at them at a time. Therefore, the rapid follow-up shots provided by a semi-auto rifle aren’t nearly as important as you might think when it comes to getting hits on target.
Then there are the sights. The main complaint about the AK47 has always been its rather crude sights. Not the design specifically, because the rifle has a functional rear notch and post front, but rather the sight radius. The distance between the front and rear sights is so short as to make engaging targets at distance much more difficult than would be the case if you were wielding just about any other rifle in the field at the time the AK47 was introduced.
I never had any reason not to take Cooper at his word, and his brief comment on the subject is the main reason why, 20 years ago, I found myself the proud new owner of a Winchester 1894 in .30-30. I promptly took it to the well-known Williams Gun Sight in Davison, Mich., where the company installed its adjustable rear receiver sight. This rear receiver sight has interchangeable screw-in peep inserts…but if you don’t put in an insert, the rear sight housing itself becomes a ghost ring.
1894-vs-ak47-winchester-model-3
The AK used was a loaner, a Chinese Poly Tech AK with spike bayonet. It had an excellent trigger, but like all AKs was a bit handicapped by its sights.
That rifle is still in my possession, and I’ll probably pass it down to my children. It should be no surprise that I’ve taken it deer hunting in northwestern Michigan. What might be surprising is that, for 10 years, it was my truck gun, for those situations where a pistol just wouldn’t be enough.
Sound crazy? How many of you are carrying either a .380 Auto or a revolver for self-defense? One is an underpowered cartridge, the other an antiquated design even older than the Winchester. Do you feel undergunned?
Like I said, I never had any reason to doubt Cooper’s findings, even though the idea of a lever-action gun beating the world’s most famous assault rifle at any distance might seem counterintuitive. But why take someone’s word when testing it for yourself gives you an excuse to head to the range and shoot one of your favorite rifles?
The Winchester 1894 was designed in that year by none other than John M. Browning. Like just about every other firearm he designed, it is very ergonomic and size efficient, and points very naturally.
It was originally designed to fire metallic blackpowder cartridges, then the smokeless .30 WCF (Winchester Center Fire) which was later renamed the .30-30 by Marlin because they didn’t want to give Winchester any free publicity. The .30-30 name stuck.
vs-ak47-winchester-model-1894-4
The rear receiver sight on the Winchester 1894 is from Williams Gun Sight and accepts interchangeable peep inserts. If you leave them out, the end result is a ghost-ring type aperture.
This rifle has been chambered in numerous calibers, but in .30-30 the tubular magazine holds six cartridges. With a 20-inch barrel, it is 38 inches long overall and weighs 6.8 lbs. It is very narrow; the buttstock is wider than the receiver.
My Winchester 1894 is a Centennial Edition put out in 1994. The receiver is marked 1894–1994. It unfortunately sports the completely unnecessary crossbolt safety in the receiver (not part of Browning’s original design), which came about in 1992 when then owners FN Herstal wanted a rifle that could be sold internationally.
Luckily, the body of the rear receiver sight not just protects the ugly safety sticking out the left side of the gun, but does a good job of blocking it from view. The wood on my specimen is a bit plain. Apart from replacing the rear sight, the only thing I’ve done to customize this rifle is attach a leather side-saddle made by Galco. It holds five cartridges and looks very cowboy tactical.
Ironically, the standard rear sight on a Winchester 1894 is a forward-mounted notch, on the barrel, not unlike what you see with the AK47. Sight radius with the factory rear sight is about 17 inches. The Williams receiver sight increases the sight radius to 23.5 inches, and replaces the cruder open sight with a peep sight adjustable for windage and elevation. With the smaller apertures unscrewed, the body of the peep makes a perfect ghost ring, and has an aperture .22 of an inch wide, according to my calipers.
ak47-winchester-model-1894-vs-5
The “barleycorn” front sight on the Winchester is narrower than the front sight on the AK. It worked very well in combination with the rear ghost ring.
The front sight on my Winchester 1894 is a one-piece blued steel post that narrows at the top, tipped with a ball. Apparently, this is called a “barleycorn” type front sight. The post is .085 of an inch wide just below the ball, and the ball is .1 of an inch wide, and the top of the front sight is .5 of an inch above the barrel.
A ghost ring sighting system works just like a standard rear peep sight, but because the rear aperture is larger, it is quicker to use, albeit less precise at distance. The larger aperture tends to blur or ghost out as you look through it and focus on the front sight.
How big is the rear aperture? While looking through it with a proper sight picture not only can I see the entire front sight post, I can see the entire barrel leading up to the front sight.
You never burn through thousands of rounds in a lever-action, and I probably didn’t have much more than 100–150 rounds through the rifle all told before I pulled it out of the safe for this article. Trigger pull on my specimen was two-stage—a very light takeup with a crisp break, with a total weight of 7 lbs. Not exactly target grade, but perfectly acceptable for the design.
winchester-1894-model-ak47-vs-6
Tarr’s Winchester is a Centennial Model produced in 1994. He regards it unfortunate that it sports a crossbolt receiver safety, not found in the original ’94.
The AK47 hardly needs any introduction to any Firearms News reader. According to the Soviet propaganda machine, it was designed by Mikhail Kalashnikov, a World War II tank hero with no firearms design or engineering experience. Chambered in the 7.62x39mm cartridge, the original AK47 was a select-fire gas piston operated rifle. It is the most widely produced military rifle in the world.
Semi-auto versions of the AK47 have been available in the U.S. for more than 30 years, in many different configurations. For this article, I wanted to use a rifle that would be similar to what Jeff Cooper had available in the mid-80s.
I own a Norinco AK47, but it was out of consideration because I replaced the rear sight with a rear peep sight made by Tech-Sights mounted at the rear of the receiver, nearly doubling the sight radius and making it much easier to shoot the rifle accurately.
I ended up borrowing a Chinese-made Poly Tech AK47 imported by KFS. It sports a folding spike bayonet, plain muzzle at the end of a 16.3-inch barrel and nicely varnished wood. Just as factory triggers on AR-15s generally suck, factory triggers on AKs tend to be very nice. The trigger on the Poly Tech AK was a single stage, with a long smooth pull, total weight 3.75 pounds—much lighter than my Winchester 1894.
model-winchester-ak47-vs-1894-7
The ’94 was completely reliable, and one look here should tell you why—controlled feeding. When the nose of the next round pops up it is almost inside the chamber.
This AK47 ran close to 9 pounds empty, and was shorter than the Winchester 1894 at 34.25 inches. The factory rear sight was the standard notch adjustable for elevation out to 800 meters. The front sight is a post about .11 of an inch wide. Distance between the front and rear sight is a mere 15 inches.
While it is possible with these sights to ring steel silhouettes out to 300 meters with regularity from a steady rest…it is not easy. Personally I would class the sights on an AK47 more appropriate for use on an SMG than a front-line assault rifle, but the Soviets have a much different philosophy with regards to their soldiers than, say, the U.S. Marine Corps.
A distance of 23.5 inches on the Winchester 1894 versus 15 inches on the AK47 means that the sight radius of the Winchester 1894 is 57 percent longer. Add to that the fact that the Winchester’s front sight is narrower and it is not hard to see that simply from looking at the numbers, it would seem that the Winchester 1894 would be capable of more precise aimed fire, all else being equal.
Let’s talk cartridges. The original Soviet 7.62x39mm load features a 123-grain bullet that exits the muzzle of an AK at about 2350 fps. Most commercial loads available today are very similar to that, and for this test I chose to use Wolf Military Classic ammunition. This steel-cased ammunition features a 124-grain hollow-point bullet, and out of the Poly Tech AK47, it chronographed at 2314 fps.
1894-ak47-model-vs-winchester-8
The AK’s rear notch sight is adjustable out to 800 meters but tends to block a lot of the view downrange, especially when shooting at distant targets.
There are two common bullet weights for the .30-30 Winchester 1894: 150 and 170 grains. For this article, Winchester very graciously supplied me with ammunition in both bullet weights. Heck, it only seemed right to use Winchester ammunition in a Winchester rifle. This was Winchester Super-X ammo loaded with Power-Point bullets (jacketed soft points). Untold tens of thousands of deer have been killed with this and functionally identical ammunition over the last hundred years.
I chronographed both loads. Out of the Winchester’s 20-inch barrel, the 170-grain Power-Point averaged 2152 fps. The 150-grain load averaged 2336 fps, almost the exact same velocity as the 7.62x39mm Wolf ammo exiting the AK, so I decided to use that bullet weight in my testing. Both loads had about the same felt recoil in the Winchester 1894.
When it came time to test the rifles, I had some decisions to make. I elected to use standard cardboard silhouettes, and to engage them from 25, 50, and 100 yards. One round per target, and any hit on paper counted.
As for how many targets to shoot at each time….I decided on four. I varied their heights off the ground by several feet and spaced them irregularly so I would be required to actually acquire each target and not just time my trigger pulls with my swing.
vs-model-ak47-1894-winchester-9
The numbers say it all—the AK is more handicapped by its short sight radius than it is by the sights themselves. Functional for combat, and that’s about it.
Each run began with the rifle at low ready, and I recorded the times using a Competition Electronics Pocket Pro shot timer. Shooting at 25 and 50 yards was done offhand, while I rested my forearm on a wooden support (the kind of expedient rest you might find and use in the field) when shooting at 100 yards.
Felt recoil was stiffer on the Winchester 1894, and the trigger pull was heavier, but as soon as I raised both rifles at the 25-yard line I could see how much superior the sights were on the Winchester 1894.
The initial runs were done with the four targets placed rather close together in a 5-yard spread. At 25 yards, the AK47 was noticeably quicker, an average 3.2 seconds per run versus 3.75 for the Winchester 1894. The softer recoil and smooth trigger really helped.
At 50 yards I had to spend more time on target acquisition, sight alignment, and trigger control for both rifles, but the AK47 was still faster with an average 4.25 seconds per run versus 4.5 for the Winchester.
ak47-model-vs-1894-winchester-10
Tarr deliberately chose to use an AK without a muzzle device, just to keep things fair. The spike bayonet is always useful to have if beset by imperialist hordes.
In case you’re wondering, working the lever of the Winchester 1894 is actually very instinctual. Even though it had been years since I last fired the rifle, it only took me a few runs to get up to speed. Many cowboy action shooters use customized lever-action rifles, where the throw of the lever has been shortened so much their hand barely has to come off the wood to jack the next round in, but the action of my rifle is bone stock.
The lever has to go past the vertical for full travel, and yet it can be worked surprisingly quickly—at silhouette targets 10 yards away, it’s easy to fire one aimed round every three-quarters of a second once you get in the groove. Keep the rifle up to the shoulder and use vigor when working the lever, much like you would when utilizing a pump shotgun (another antiquated weapon).
Shooting at 100 yards, the light trigger on the AK47 was very valuable, but not as valuable as the improved sights on the Winchester 1894. My runs with the Winchester were consistently .1 second faster than the AK47.
At 100 yards with the Winchester 1894, my main concern was a controlled squeeze of the trigger. With the AK47 at that distance…to be honest that wide rear notch really obscures a lot of the target area, and slowed me down, whereas with the ghost ring-equipped Winchester I had no problem seeing everything. I found the ghost ring rear sight just allowed for quicker target engagement at 50 yards and beyond.
winchester-ak47-vs-1894-model-11
Tarr chose common ammunition—Wolf Classic steel cased 124-grain HPs, and Winchester 150-grain JSP Power-Points. Both loads had nearly identical velocities.
But…those first runs were with the four targets placed rather close together, which is a lot more like a shooting exercise than what you’d see in real life (unless like someone I know who witnessed human wave attacks while fighting in Korea). Instead of a 5-yard spread, for my next test I dragged the targets farther apart, so they were 15 yards from end-to-end.
With the targets farther apart, even at 25 yards, there was barely any time wasted working the lever of the Winchester 1894, as it was done while transitioning between targets. The better trigger and lower recoil of the AK47 kept it in the lead at 25 yards, but just barely, and that lead vanished when I moved out to 50 yards and beyond.
So, yes, in my limited testing, I reproduced Jeff Cooper’s results—when engaging individual targets with one round each, at 50 yards and beyond, a Winchester 1894 with a ghost ring rear sight cannot just keep up with an AK47 but beat it.
This was definitely a fun exercise and illuminating. As far as reliability, the vaunted AK47 actually jammed a couple of times on one of my steel Chinese magazines. The only problem I had with the Winchester 1894 was me short-stroking the lever once and not chambering
a round.
model-vs-1894-ak47-winchester-12
With targets close together, the AK had an advantage out to 50 yards. With the targets spread, the Winchester beat the AK at both 50 and 100 yards.
I felt a little like a cowboy, getting the barrel of a Winchester 1894 too hot to touch, working the lever so much a healed cut on my hand started to bleed. I’m sure if any ladies had been in the area, they would have remarked at how manly I looked…maybe swooned.
Out of curiosity, I ran through the same shooting exercises with a red dot-equipped AR15. I found that I was at least 30 percent faster with the lower recoiling optically sighted black rifle. I’m not sure how fair the comparison is, considering the AR is a .223, not a .30, and as a design is 20 years younger than the AK47 (and 70 years younger than the Winchester 1894.).
Am I saying the Winchester 1894 is as useful in combat as an AK47? No. Nothing of the sort. But, cowboy, someday you may find yourself trapped inside or behind your fallen steed (Bronco, Mustang, etc.). If you have time to get to a rifle, that means the circling Indians aren’t right on top of you.
If that’s the case, my limited testing showed me that a Winchester 1894 probably won’t be a handicap when compared to an AK47, either in the accuracy or speed department, at distances of 50 yards and more.

An interesting comparison by James Tarr in Firearms News, but Rico says he'll still take the 1894...

25 Things You Didn't Know About "Schindler's List"

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/featured/25-things-schindlers_list.html?utm_source=getresponse&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=warhistoryonline&utm_content=%5BWar+History+Online%5D+Your+Daily+Dose

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

Never work here

From The New York Times:

Want to Drive in Beijing? Good Luck in the License Plate Lottery

By OWEN GUO

The city restricts local plates through an online registry intended to help improve air quality and ease traffic congestion.

History for the day: YEAR: Charles marries Diana

Britain's Prince Charles married Lady Diana Spencer at St. Paul's Cathedral in London, England.

Lava pictures from 'smiling' Hawaiian Kilauea volcano eruption - BBC News

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-36921980?ocid=global_bbccom_email_29072016_top+video

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

The Next iPhone Will Be Very Different in One Big Way

What will life be like in a world without headphone jacks?

http://time.com/4424676/apple-iphone-7-rumors-headphone-jack-lightning/?xid=emailshare

Sent from my iPhone

Mark Seymour
215.866.6184
mseymour@proofmark.com

http://chronicle.com/article/The-Nazi-Rorschach-Tests/237231?cid=gn&utm_source=gn&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=a75dab68ce3d4f41b2b46cd6b3717bd7&elq=cbd42a5a91c64798a85170380ade347c&elqaid=10025&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=3710

mseymour@proofmark.com
215.866.6184

Sent from my new iPad

215.866.6184

mseymour@proofmark.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: "HISTORY | This Day In History" <tdih@emails.history.com>
Date: July 27, 2016 at 6:01:53 AM EDT
To: "mseymour@proofmark.com" <mseymour@proofmark.com>
Subject: 1974: House begins impeachment of Nixon

This day in History

Jul
27 THIS DAY IN HISTORY

1974

House begins impeachment of Nixon

On this day in 1974, the House Judiciary Committee recommends that America's 37th president, Richard M. Nixon, be impeached and removed from office. The impeachment proceedings resulted from a series of political scandals involving the Nixon administration that came to be collectively known as... read more »

American Revolution

1776

Silas Deane writes Congress of success »

Automotive

1990

Last Citroen 2CV rolls off the line in Portugal »

Civil War

1863

Ardent secessionist William Lowndes Yancey dies »

Cold War

1953

Armistice ends the Korean War »

Crime

1981

Adam Walsh is abducted »

Disaster

2002

Fighter jet crashes into crowd at air show »

General Interest

1794

Robespierre overthrown in France »

1921

Insulin isolated in Toronto »

1949

First jet makes test flight »

1980

Ousted shah of Iran dies in exile »

1996

Bombing at Centennial Olympic Park »

Hollywood

2003

Bob Hope dies at 100 »

Literary

1916

Elizabeth Hardwick is born »

Music

1991

Natalie Cole's Unforgettable: With Love goes to #1 »

Old West

1806

Meriwether Lewis shoots Blackfoot Indian »

Presidential

1974

Nixon charged with first of three articles of impeachment »

Sports

1993

Reggie Lewis dies »

Vietnam War

1964

Pentagon announces 5,000 more troops to Vietnam »

1965

U.S. jets attack new North Vietnamese air defense sites »

World War I

1916

Germans execute British seaman Captain Charles Fryatt »

World War II

1943

Stalin issues Order No. 227-outlawing cowards »

SHOWS VIDEOS SCHEDULE TOPICS GAMES

Subscribe | Update Profile | Contact Us

This is a promotional email from HISTORY and A+E Networks.
You received this message because mseymour@proofmark.com is subscribed to This Day In History email updates. If you DO NOT wish to receive these emails please UNSUBSCRIBE.

Having trouble viewing this message? View the web version.

To ensure delivery to your inbox (not junk folders) and view images, please add us to your address book or safe/white list.

© 2016 A&E Television Networks, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Email Marketing, 235 E 45th Street, New York, NY 10017

Corporate Information | TV Parental Guidelines | Careers | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy | Ad Sales | Ad Choices

31 July 2016

30 July 2016

29 July 2016

By OWEN GUO

28 July 2016

27 July 2016