Charlie Campbell has a
Time article about
Manila's street kids:
Was the Philippine capital really purged of unsightly urchins for the Pope's recent visit, as media reports allege? Pope Francis took the helm of the Catholic Church last year, vowing to refashion the institution “for the poor”. Yet during his recent five-day visit to the Philippines, where he presided over Mass for more than six million rapturous worshippers, it appeared many of the nation’s most impoverished were cruelly banished from view.
As the Pontiff touched down in Asia’s most Catholic nation, reports emerged that street children had been rounded up and caged in order to sanitize Manila’s streets. Local authorities vehemently denied this was a case, pointing out that the accompanying photographs of an emaciated toddler and young girl handcuffed to a metal pole had in fact been taken months earlier. However, rumors continued to swirl as more anecdotal evidence arrived. So was the Philippine capital purged of unsightly urchins? In a word, yes, although only a small fraction of this was anything new.
According to local activists, street children are constantly being rounded up across this sprawling metropolis of twelve million. This is generally for vagrancy and petty crime— they are often scapegoats for the deeds committed by organized gangs— and, although numbers are hard to pin down, the Pope’s visit seemed to herald a slight uptick.
“There’s definitely been a ramp up,” Catherine Scerri, deputy director of the Bahay Tuluyan NGO that helps street children, told Time. “They were definitely told not to be visible, and many of them felt that if they didn’t move they would be taken forcibly.”
Those detained end up a various municipal detention centers all over Manila, says Father Shay Cullen, the Nobel Peace Prize-nominated founder of the Preda Foundation NGO. These local adult jails each adjoin euphemistically named “children’s homes”, which, like the adult facility, has bars on the windows. Children are summarily kept for anything up to three months without charge, with little ones sharing cells with young adults. Many fall prey to serious sexual and physical abuse: kids just eight years old are often tormented into performing sex acts on the older detainees, says Cullen. (Amnesty International documented such abuses in a December 2014 report.)
“They are locked up in a dungeon,” says Cullen, explaining that some twenty thousand children see the inside of a jail cell annually across the Philippines. “We keep asking why they put these little kids in with the older guys.”
Nevertheless, Philippines Welfare Secretary Corazon Juliano-Soliman explicitly denies that homeless children were rounded up for the Papal visit, highlighting that they were, in fact, central to the 78-year-old Pontiff’s reception. Some four hundred homeless kids (albeit in bright, new threads) sang at a special event and posed awkward theological questions.
Any children detained, explains Juliano-Soliman, were “abandoned, physically or mentally challenged, or found to be vagrant or in trouble with the law, and we are taking care of them.” Father Cullen’s allegations, Juliano-Soliman suggests, are a sympathy ploy to win donations “One can’t help but think it’s a good fundraising action,” she says wryly. However, Juliano-Soliman did confirm that a hundred homeless families, comprising five hundred parents and children, were taken off the street of Roxas Boulevard, the palm-fringed thoroughfare arcing Manila Bay, along which Pope Francis traveled several times, and taken about an hour and a half’s drive away to the plush Chateau Royal Batangas resort, where rooms range from ninety to five hundred dollars per night.
This sojourn lasted from 14 January 2015, the day before Pope Francis’ visit, until 19 January, the day he left. It was organized by the Department of Social Welfare’s Modified Conditional Cash Transfer program, which provides grants to aid “families with special needs.”
Juliano-Soliman says this was done so that families would “not be vulnerable to the influx of people coming to witness the Pope.” Pressed to clarify, she expressed fears that the destitute “could be seen as not having a positive influence in the crowd” and could be “used by people who do not have good intentions”.
For Scerri, though, this reasoning doesn’t cut it: “It’s very difficult to believe that children and families who have lived on the streets for most of their lives need to be protected from what was a very joyous, very happy, very peaceful celebration.”
In fact, families involved were only told two days prior that they were to make the trip to Chateau Royal Batangas. “Many felt that if they didn’t participate that they would be rounded up,” says Scerri, adding that those who returned to their usual digs by Malate Catholic Church found large signs had been painted in the interim that prohibited sleeping rough.
Ultimately, whether jailed or stashed in a resort, “there’s nothing new,” says Father Cullen. “Every time dignitaries come, it’s a common phenomenon for more children to be locked up.”
So where did Manila’s street children go? The truth is that most people didn’t really care, just as long as they did.
Rico says third world countries can get away with stuff we can't...
No comments:
Post a Comment
No more Anonymous comments, sorry.