While we're on astronomy...

...Manya A. Brachear of the Chicago Tribune has an article in the Los Angeles Times about Galileo and the Catholic Church:

Some people believe the world revolves around them, and their belief is born, not of selfishness, but of faith. A few conservative Roman Catholics are pointing to a dozen Bible verses and the Church's original teachings as proof that Earth is the center of the universe, the view that was at the heart of the Church's clash with Galileo Galilei four centuries ago. The relatively obscure movement has gained a following among those who find comfort in knowing there are still staunch defenders of early church doctrine. "This subject is, as far as I can see, an embarrassment to the modern church, because the world more or less looks upon geocentrism, or someone who believes it, in the same boat as those who believe in a flat Earth," said James Phillips of Cicero, Illinois. Phillips attends Our Lady Immaculate Catholic Church in Oak Park, Illinois, a parish run by the Society of St. Pius X, which rejects most of the modernizing reforms made by the Vatican II council from 1962 to 1965.
But, by challenging modern science, proponents of a geocentric universe are challenging the very church they seek to serve and protect. "I have no idea who these people are," said Brother Guy Consolmagno, curator of meteorites and spokesman for the Vatican Observatory. "Are they sincere, or is this a clever bit of theater?"
Those promoting geocentrism argue that heliocentrism, or the centuries-old consensus among scientists that Earth revolves around the sun, is a conspiracy to squelch the Church's influence. "Heliocentrism becomes dangerous if it is being propped up as the true system when, in fact, it is a false system," said Robert Sungenis, leader of a budding movement to get scientists to reconsider. "False information leads to false ideas, and false ideas lead to illicit and immoral actions— thus the state of the world today. Prior to Galileo, the Church was in full command of the world, and governments and academia were subservient to her." Sungenis is no Don Quixote. Hundreds of curiosity seekers, skeptics, and supporters attended a conference last fall titled Galileo Was Wrong. The Church Was Right near the University of Notre Dame campus in South Bend, Indiana.
Astrophysicists at Notre Dame didn't appreciate the group hitching its wagon to America's flagship Catholic university and resurrecting a concept that's extinct for a reason. "It's an idea whose time has come and gone," astrophysics professor Peter Garnavich said. "There are some people who want to move the world back to the 1950s when it seemed like a better time. These are people who want to move the world back to the 1250s." Garnavich said the theory of geocentrism violates what he believes should be a strict separation of church and science. One answers why, the other answers how, and never the twain should meet, he said.
But supporters contend there is scientific evidence to support geocentrism, just as there is evidence to support the six-day story of creation in Genesis. There is proof in Scripture that the Earth is the center of the universe, Sungenis said. Among many verses, he cites Joshua 10:12-14 as definitive proof: "And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, while the nation took vengeance on its foe... The sun halted in the middle of the sky; not for a whole day did it resume its swift course."
But Ken Ham, founder of the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky, said the Bible is silent on geocentrism. "There's a big difference between looking at the origin of the planets, the solar system, and the universe and looking at presently how they move and how they are interrelated," Ham said. "The Bible is neither geocentric or heliocentric. It does not give any specific information about the structure of the solar system."
Just as Ham challenges the foundation of natural history museums by disputing evolution, Sungenis challenges planetariums, most notably the Vatican Observatory. But Consolmagno said the very premise of going after Galileo illustrates the theory's lack of scientific credibility. "Of course, we understand the universe in a far more nuanced way than Galileo did four hundred years ago," he said. "And I would hope that the next four hundred years would see just as much development."

Rico says proof? The Bible is proof? Of what? A consensual delusion perpetrated by a small bunch of turncoat Jews two thousand years ago? But trying to ignore heliocentrism is so far past stupid that Rico says he can't even comment on it... (And for Rico to not have a comment is pretty rare.)