Britain is providing limited assistance to the Libyan rebels fighting the forces of Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi, including protective clothing for police officers, Foreign Secretary William Hague has said, a day after France acknowledged providing light weapons to the rebels.
The British military has furnished five thousand sets of body armor, over six thousand police uniforms, and five thousand high visibility vests and t-shirts, Foreign Minister William Hague said in a written statement to Parliament, adding that the supply of such equipment was “fully in line” with United Nations resolutions governing arms embargoes. “This equipment will enable the civilian police to carry out their functions more securely and better protect National Transitional Council representatives and the significant international and NGO communities in Benghazi, Misurata, and other areas of Libya,” Mr. Hague said.
A spokesman in Paris said the French military had recently provided the rebels with arms and ammunition, including assault rifles, machine guns, and rocket-propelled grenades and launchers, the first Western government to acknowledge having done so. The aid, which was delivered along with food and medicines, did not include heavy weapons, he said, and was appropriate for civilians to use in self-defense.
With a “no-boots-on-the-ground policy” in Libya, the French, British, and United States governments are hoping that the rebels, with the aid of alliance airstrikes, will be able to topple the Qaddafi government. The British government said that it believes shipping arms to the rebels would be legal in some cases, a Foreign Office spokesman said, but is not doing so now. “We do think the United Nations resolutions allow in certain limited circumstances defensive weapons to be provided,” said the spokesman, who cannot be identified in line with government rules. “But the United Kingdom is not engaged in that. Other countries will interpret the resolution in their own way.”
01 July 2011
The Brits kick in
David Jolly has an article in The New York Times about Britain and Libya:
No comments:
Post a Comment
No more Anonymous comments, sorry.