04 May 2011

Land as art

Randy Kennedy has an article in The New York Times about art in the West:
Native son Buddy Holly aside, the small city of Lubbock, Texas, on the tableland of the southern Great Plains, has never had a lot to recommend it, culturally or aesthetically. When Coronado passed through the area in the sixteenth century, he described an acute sense of European disorientation as his men struggled to plot a course across a place “with no more landmarks than if we had been swallowed up by the sea”.
These days a few landmarks rise above the flatness: water towers, radio antennae, lonely-looking trees. Mostly, though, there is still “a lot of land, but nowhere to go,” as the artist Donald Judd observed of West Texas. So there may be few better bases of operation for an unusual academic program that has taken root here under the guidance of a Harvard-trained architecture professor at Texas Tech University, in which scholars study and make art in places about as far away from museums and galleries— and from bathrooms, decent beds, and air-conditioning— as is possible within the continental United States.
Called Land Arts of the American West, the classes take place in a pair of heavy-duty Ford vans, or wherever the vans and the camping gear they carry end up stopping during a seven-thousand-mile, two-month drive that a handful of participants— mostly architecture graduate and undergraduate students, but also artists, art historians, and students recruited from other disciplines— make throughout the West.
The tangible result of the trip is an annual exhibition of art, writing, and other documentary material about the journey. But the heart of the program exists out on the road, where it has found common ground with a growing number of idiosyncratic, environment-focused art initiatives like it that have sprung up in the West over the last several years: quasi collectives like the Center for Land Use Interpretation, based in Los Angeles; the Center for Art and Environment at the Nevada Museum of Art in Reno; and in San Francisco, the For-Site Foundation, which describes itself as “art about place” and conducts a residency program in the Sierra, Nevada foothills outside the gold-mining town of Nevada City, California.
The Lubbock program is directed by Chris Taylor, who helped develop the concept, along with an artist named Bill Gilbert, who has run an initiative with the same name and similar concerns at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, since 2000. Mr. Taylor moved his program two years ago from the University of Texas, Austin, to Texas Tech, which puts him and his students at the eastern edge of a huge swath of territory— southwestern Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, and Nevada— that he has made his classroom.
Many of the stops along the trip are expected, the legacies of the land-art and Earthworks movement, which transplanted the idea of sculpture to the country’s trackless open spaces beginning in the 1960s: Robert Smithson’s Spiral Jetty, offshore at the Great Salt Lake near Rozel Point, Utah; Walter De Maria’s Lightning Field in western New Mexico; Nancy Holt’s Sun Tunnels in northwestern Utah; Michael Heizer’s Double Negative, two deep trenches cut into the edge of a mesa in the Nevada desert.
But other stops, some requiring close observation of the odometer in places so remote that GPS is of little use, suggest a kind of Addams Family sightseeing vacation, with an itinerary drawn up by Rachel Carson and Howard Zinn with help from Foucault and the Marquis de Sade. Students have spent time near one of the world’s largest open-pit uranium mines, now inactive, on the Laguna Pueblo reservation west of Albuquerque. They have camped on a desolate patch of New Mexico desert land called Cabinetlandia, owned by the art magazine Cabinet, wedged between an active rail line and screaming traffic on Interstate 10, where there is little more in the way of amenities than a mailbox and a filing-cabinet community “library” embedded in a concrete-and-soil wall.
“It might be one of the worst places on the face of the earth to try to inhabit, to try to be stationary while everything else is only there for a moment, moving through at high speed,” recalled Meredith James, a New York sculptor and video artist who participated in the field trip in 2009, when she was a graduate art student at Yale. The campers that year tried to reimagine the roar from the highway as the roar of the surf, and they set up beach chairs along the road. But after only a couple of days on the land, they became so encrusted with dirt and grime that they had to drive to nearby Deming, New Mexico and wash themselves in the sinks of a coin-operated laundry.
The program operates on a shoestring budget of about $30,000, provided by participants’ fees and some money from private donors. Mr. Taylor describes it as a “semester abroad in our own backyard” and said he planned it to try to be as agnostic about the definition of art as the vast landscape itself is. “I define art as anything people have done on the land,” he said, adding that the West is an ideal place for such an approach. (“Arid lands are unable to hold secrets,” Mr. Taylor once wrote.) He added: “I think there are important lessons here that are more than just art history lessons. Not to take anything away from art history, but this is more broadly about how we’ve shaped the land, and how it has shaped us.”
William L. Fox, a writer and the director of the Center for Art + Environment in Reno, Nevada, said he believed that these kinds of wildly interdisciplinary art-making and academic activities might be flourishing in the West because artists see it as a place where boundaries are less rigid, and they can go looking for insights from many fields of knowledge, the way hard sciences have long done. “For me, art is about making metaphors, and to do that you feed on new sources of information,” said Mr. Fox, who has served as a field lecturer for the Lubbock program. “In a sense that’s all artists are doing, the same as scientists: ‘What areas can we poke our noses into that give us new information and show us how to make work in a way we’ve never thought of?’ ”
Rocio Mendoza, an architecture graduate student who traveled with the group in 2010, returned to Lubbock to propose a kind of design idea that at first glance might seem like merely a fantastical conceptual exercise: to erect tens of thousands of small, cheap shelters along the United States’ border with Mexico. But the idea came to her after she walked away from the group one morning in the southern Arizona scrub and ran into two disoriented Mexican men who were crossing illegally into the country and asked her for food. She made a video about the experience, in which she recalled her mother’s stories of being carried across the Rio Grande many years before, seven months pregnant with Ms. Mendoza. “Meeting those two guys,” she says in the video, looking into the camera, “it all suddenly clicked and became personal and political.”
Rico says great art is usually anti-establishment, and building shelters for illegal aliens would certainly qualify...

No comments:

Post a Comment

No more Anonymous comments, sorry.